• Stoneykins@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really. Some instances have upvotes only, and they still work perfectly fine as link and comment aggregators.

      It mostly prevents dogpiling and certain types of brigading to not allow downvotes. I haven’t seen any downsides personally.

      • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No instance has no downvotes, they just hide the button in the theme like subreddits would do too. And nothing about this system prevents people from mass downvoting or upvoting a post because of group think, ask me how I know.

        • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you downvote my comments they do not register on my instance. It is more than the lack of a visible button, the downvotes do not federate.

          Edit: to be clear, this post is on lemmy.world, so I can be downvoted here (even though I won’t see it unless I browse from lemmy.world). And from lemmy.world you can appear to downvote things on instances without downvotes, but you are basically just downvoting the local copy of the thing. The downvote never gets sent through, it just lives on your instance.

          • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If your instance removed the button, the system will register the votes, even if you can’t see it. This is just more fragmentation of the experience for users fostering more confusion and alienation of new users.

            Wanna check? Log in though an app and… Ta da, downvotes!

            • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok, I logged into jerboa.

              Still no downvotes. Just because some apps can show the downvotes from the api doesn’t mean they are federated.

              For the record, downvote me. Please. I don’t care. I like not having a downvote because it doesn’t allow me to downvote other people. It helps keep me in a better headspace.

              • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If you can’t downvote bad posts, then you will see a massive rise of bad posts. This is why YouTube removing the dislike button was such an issue.

                • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not really in my experience. I can tell when something is disliked by how few upvotes it recieves. Instead of bad posts sitting at the bottom with -20 votes, they sit at the bottom with 1 vote. Functionally the same.

                  Youtube removing the dislike button was more about their attempt to obfuscate public opinion on things like movie trailers, game trailers, and the various videos related to big PR decisions by companies. The companies posting these things wanted a hosting place where only positive interactions are allowed, regardless of the topic in question, and youtube accommodated them.

                  It is still infinitly possible to distinguish bad videos from good ones without a dislike button on youtube. But it is much more difficult now to find out how many people agree with you that a video is bad, which used to be nice to know on things like movie trailers, game trailers, and big PR decisions.

                  • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If you remove downvotes you remove the recourse users have to push down bad content. A bad post with 100 upvotes and 500 potential downvotes should never see the light of day because the community decided it’s a bad post. But because no one can push it down and there isn’t enough content to push up over it, now a bad post 10 people would have seen and pushed out of the system is now bothering well over 500 more people because you couldn’t downvote it.

    • Sackbut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really. I’m on another Lemmy instance that doesn’t have it, and I really like it. Not sure why people are upset at my comment.

      • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because if the only way you can interact with a post is by voting up or voting down, then a few problems occur. First, any instance or app that lets you use the downvotes now has a stronger voice than anyone who isn’t using the downvotes. Second, it means users can not push down bad content without a consistent supply of new content to vote over it, a massive problem for small communities. And third, it fragments the community making the service harder to use.