no banana @lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-224 days agoGravid vättelemmy.worldimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down10
arrow-up1149arrow-down1imageGravid vättelemmy.worldno banana @lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-224 days agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squarehemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-223 days agoThe best guess I could find online about these with 5min search Sorry for r*ddit
minus-squareno banana @lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-223 days agoYep. That’s pretty much correct. Edit: except for what the comment above says about the safety part.
minus-squared00ery@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-223 days agoAlthough, I think safety matches are ones that will only strike on the rough side of the box, rather than a wall or chin stubble. But I rather like the idea that they have matches that don’t burn all the way down. https://www.britannica.com/science/safety-match
minus-squareno banana @lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·23 days agoYes! I missed that part. It’s correct that it means that they only strike on the rough part of the box. The safety being in the fact that they don’t spontaneously ignite.
The best guess I could find online about these with 5min search Sorry for r*ddit
Yep. That’s pretty much correct.
Edit: except for what the comment above says about the safety part.
Although, I think safety matches are ones that will only strike on the rough side of the box, rather than a wall or chin stubble.
But I rather like the idea that they have matches that don’t burn all the way down. https://www.britannica.com/science/safety-match
Yes! I missed that part. It’s correct that it means that they only strike on the rough part of the box. The safety being in the fact that they don’t spontaneously ignite.