• trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t doubt that there is a factor but you’re clearly overestimating how much of a factor it is.

    If two smart people have a kid and the kid grows up in poverty, they’re much less likely to grow to be “successful”.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      What do you mean when you say that I’m “overestimating”? I’m asking this because I feel like you’re thinking that I’m claiming something I don’t think I’m claiming.

      • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, you claimed that children of parents with higher IQ have more successful children.

        I pointed out that this is largely due to social factors, to which you replied a non sequitur about how intelligence has a genetic component.

        From that, a reasonable person would assume that you believe that genetics is a major component of IQ, and not just a small contributing factor.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Well, you claimed that children of parents with higher IQ have more successful children.

          That wasn’t my first claim. My first claim was that IQ predicts success.

          I pointed out that this is largely due to social factors, to which you replied a non sequitur about how intelligence has a genetic component.

          Then I went here because you brought up parents. So not a non-sequitur but a specific reply to your comment.

          From that, a reasonable person would assume that you believe that genetics is a major component of IQ, and not just a small contributing factor.

          When I specifically said it’s not clear how big of a factor it is. So no, I don’t think a reasonable person would assume that.