If it is accepting defeat, perhaps I retract the statement and agree with your sentiment that this moveent is wrong and should be challenged as much as they are challenging “natalism”.
But I guess I mean that it is hard for drunks to stay sober when being in a bar atmosphere. The social and environmental factors may make having more kids challenging.
I suspect that with more freedom, more people would have more resources with which they could have more kids. It’s a vicious cycle of poverty, socialist policies and government regulations, which make things expensive and discourage and incentivize people to not have families.
or destructive movements like feminism. I guess I think that you could maybe more indirectly attack antinatalism by attacking these harmful movements rather than respond to antinatalist movements themselves. As well as encouraging people to be Christian which indirectly rejects some of the antinatalist talking points.
If it is accepting defeat, perhaps I retract the statement and agree with your sentiment that this moveent is wrong and should be challenged as much as they are challenging “natalism”.
But I guess I mean that it is hard for drunks to stay sober when being in a bar atmosphere. The social and environmental factors may make having more kids challenging.
I suspect that with more freedom, more people would have more resources with which they could have more kids. It’s a vicious cycle of poverty, socialist policies and government regulations, which make things expensive and discourage and incentivize people to not have families.
or destructive movements like feminism. I guess I think that you could maybe more indirectly attack antinatalism by attacking these harmful movements rather than respond to antinatalist movements themselves. As well as encouraging people to be Christian which indirectly rejects some of the antinatalist talking points.