• Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s not how hypotheticals work. It’s just meant to expose the flaw in your logic. In this case you’re arguing that demand for a product is not related to supply. That when dvds came out and nobody wanted a vhs player anymore everyone kept making vhs players anyway because ‘that’s not causal’.

          • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            i also explained that free agent’s actions can only be said to be caused by their own will. that means that “demand” can never cause “supply” (nor, truly, the other way around), since both those terms actually reflect the willful actions of free agents.

            • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Ok, I get you now. That’s just obtuse pedantry. If the demand for animal products goes down, so will supply. This gives an individual the power to lower supply, to choose not to has the same overall effect as killing a few animals. The distinction doesn’t matter. Your actions have consequences whether you like it or not. Animal ag cannot survive without money and whenever you buy animal products you are giving it to them.