• evatronic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re right.

    To the point the person you’re responding to is trying to get at though – the whole idea of a “police dog” is fucking insane in the first place.

    The things police dogs are used for are things police shouldn’t be doing, or are complete bullshit. “drug sniffing” is nonsense. Chasing down and attacking people is cruel on any level, either to the person being attacked, or it’s cruelty in sending a dog to attack someone armed with various weapons. Either way, the dog shouldn’t be part of the situation in the first place.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure I completely agree that dogs have no place in law enforcement. I can give a few examples:

      • Cadaver dogs and tracking hounds are an important part of criminal investigations at times.

      • Bomb sniffing dogs are definitely an important line of defense.

      • I think there is also an argument to be made that dogs are extremely useful in specific kinds of tactical situations which I would agree should be restricted to highly specialized and well trained police units.

      Where we agree is that the prevelance of K9 units that are used to give false positives that lead to drug arrests, or the gratuitous use of K9 units in normal arrests is not acceptable or warranted. It is also shown to be abused time and time again. But again, I think there is more nuance to the issue which is difficult to account for during the justifiably negative emotional response people are having to this case, and the discussion needs to be had.