• Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    5 months ago

    It avoids great man of history-ing Hitler, since killing him wouldn’t change the material conditions of Germany that lead to Hitler.

    Unfortunately if you read the thread that is not at all the point they are making.

    They pulled a strawman argument on me suggesting that electoralism is useless and jumped straight to saying I was advocating assassinating my political opponents which is something I totally definitely would not do illegal-to-say

    THEN they went on entirely unprompted to condemn the hypothetical assassination of LITERALLY HITLER.

    Basically the final boss of civility fetishism.

    • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 months ago

      Now that I read that thread I get what you’re saying. I thought they were making the point that you don’t know how things would go down if you did succeed in killing Hitler, it might do nothing, is fair.

      But the counter to that just being vote, when we know that less than nothing would’ve changed was funny. They clearly just worked backwards from saying “assassinating politician is bad” and then couldn’t admit they were wrong when it came to Hitler.

      They simplified killing Hitler to the trolley problem and decided to definitely not ever pull the lever, and instead just hope the lever pulls itself.