• Spedwell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s an ongoing case, so I don’t know what you expect of me here. My reply was to correct your misunderstanding about the focus of the case, which is not limited to the use of steam keys as you originally claimed.

    I am not aware of the european case you reference, would you mind pointing me to where I can learn more?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Why are you getting the idea that it extends to non-steam keys as well? That’s never been the case because that’s not actually true. They have no control over what price you sell a product at off the platform as long as it’s not using steam keys. So if they’re claiming that it also includes steam keys then that’s not true.

      • Spedwell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Again, I am really wanting to see this EU case you reference, because this is an issue I have been reading up on. Do you have a reference for me?

      • Spedwell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The points linked above allege Valve will delist a game from their platform if the price is lower off-platform (even for non-key sales), correct?

        This is called a “Platform Most Favored Nation” clause, and it has anti-competitive effects. It is controlling the price off-platform using the leverage of market share to coerce behaviors out of publishers.

        Please also link me this European court case, I have been unable to locate it myself.