Optional@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 5 months agoSee This Red Area? This Is Sandlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down121cross-posted to: map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz
arrow-up11.29Karrow-down1external-linkSee This Red Area? This Is Sandlemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square170fedilinkcross-posted to: map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz
minus-squareمهما طال الليل@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·5 months agoThe Commerce Clause is one often cited by conservatives. I am not a lawyer but if they can abuse it you bet they will even if that’s not what it was meant for.
minus-squarebastion@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoThe commerce clause doesn’t apply to in-state systems unless they interact with a foreign nation, native tribe, or another state. What kind of abuse is even possible here?
minus-squareمهما طال الليل@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·edit-25 months agoI saw it brought up against states setting their own emission standards. I don’t agree with it but it is something I have seen them argue.
minus-squarebastion@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoFair enough - but, emissions can be argued (with evidence) to be an interstate issue, particularly with large cities being contributors.
The Commerce Clause is one often cited by conservatives. I am not a lawyer but if they can abuse it you bet they will even if that’s not what it was meant for.
The commerce clause doesn’t apply to in-state systems unless they interact with a foreign nation, native tribe, or another state.
What kind of abuse is even possible here?
I saw it brought up against states setting their own emission standards. I don’t agree with it but it is something I have seen them argue.
Fair enough - but, emissions can be argued (with evidence) to be an interstate issue, particularly with large cities being contributors.