American gen Z voters share how they feel about Kamala Harris’s presidential bid, why they like or dislike her as a candidate and whether they think she could beat Donald Trump, as the vice-president races towards winning the Democratic nomination for November’s election.

‘I think she’s just what we need’

“I think [Kamala Harris] is the only one that makes sense. She will get the votes Biden couldn’t. She could get the Black, Asian, Latino, women’s, LGBTQ+ and youth votes. She stands more for progress and equality than an old white dude and if she wins it will be historic. The Democrats need a bold move and I think she’s just what we need.

“I hope the Democrats realize what an opportunity this is for them.” Will, 22, construction worker from Portland, Oregon

  • Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah really like who are these people who weren’t going to vote for Joe? Are they stupid?

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      uninformed/misguided apathetic “i don’t care about politics” kids who saw nothing but ancient white men and can’t/won’t distinguish between them

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s another reason Harris would be crazy to go with anyone but Mark Kelly. You’ll get people who never dreamed of voting to just vote for the novelty of an astronaut and fighter pilot.

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              I love Beau of the Fifth Column, but I have to politely disagree with him here. I’m originally from rural Appalachia and I don’t think you try to combat Vance by one-upping him with someone from that region. To me he makes less of a case for Beshear in this video and just more explains why JD Vance is a terrible pick, which I agree. Recognizing that much of the Presidential election ultimately comes down to a popularity contest, I think you go with the more flashy figure. For instance, I’m a pretty big political junkie and even I don’t know much about Beshear. That’s not to say he won’t skyrocket in name-recognition if the announcement comes that he’s her pick, but it’s just an easier sell to the average voter: “Wow, Mark Kelly is an astronaut and navy fighter pilot veteran!” The mere novelty of that will draw people to vote for him. I think this is powerful enough to draw those same voters away from Vance in itself.

              Having someone popular running as VP from a key battleground state is a plus, too. We have to realize that much of rust/bible-belt isn’t particularly in play anyway. We have Whitmer who will help carry Michigan; and we have Shapiro who will help carry Pennsylvania. Seems like Tony Evers is doing well in Wisconsin. These are the three key battleground states while the likes of AZ and NV and so forth are more secondary battleground states.

          • suction@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Wow. Americans really say shit like this without a trace of irony 🤷‍♂️

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s because of those people that you now have another, better, more winnable option. You’re welcome.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        On the other hand, if more people had turned out in 2016 we wouldn’t be here.

        Politics shouldn’t be a popularity contest.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          You could also say, if the Democrats had nominated a more likeable candidate in 2016, we wouldn’t be here.

          Clinton got less votes than Obama in 2012 and 2008, even though the population had grown during that time.

          And it wasn’t the Bernie bros who stayed home. Polling revealed that the Bernie bros showed up.

          Blaming the voters is like having your bakery go bankrupt and trying to blame people for not buying your shitty cake.

          First, bake a better cake.

          • ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            “Where are all those advertisers I told to fuck off last year?”

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            What part of “I like soldiers who didn’t get captured” and “grab them by the pussy” confused voters?

            Count Dracula should have beaten Trump.

            I totally blame the voters.

            • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I know, but we were having a conversation about 2016 and the voters didn’t pick Clinton then.

              At least, not enough of them in certain swing states.

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          It also shouldn’t be a duopoly game but here we are.

          The shorter election cycle is appreciated. This should be a thing. Say, on July 5th of an election year, then it begins.

          • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Keep the primary results a secret until a couple of weeks before the convention. It’d also help the states with late primaries to not feel irrelevant.

          • Wrench@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            We’re celebrating the apparent increase in voters that aren’t even following the duopoly policies enough to recognize literal fascism vs imperfect but generally good faith politicians.

            If they’re not informed enough to see the face eating leopard party for what it is, adding more parties to the mix won’t improve anything.

            I agree that ranked choice voting is desirable. But it won’t help with these kinds of voters.

            • zephorah@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t get that. I still have relatives trying to tell me trickle down economics works, that it is the way. Really? You think successful trickle down economics is why we all feel squeezed right now? You think that’s why Amazon workers go through hell while Bezos flies around in a penis rocket?

              Reality isn’t tracking as reality. I’m not sure how one gets to that point where a confident person in a suit announces that x is the truth and so you just start repeating x is the truth and actually believing it.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            If you want politicians to listen to you, try voting in the primaries.

            People need to educate themselves. Look at how Jerry Falwell and his ‘Moral Majority’ took over the GOP. They had one simple trck; if the local Republican clubhouse got 20 people at the regular meeting Falwell’s folks would show up with fifty. They got the little jobs, like county clerk and sheriff, and then the bigger state positions and finally were in a position to control who got the white House.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              If you want politicians to listen to you, try voting in the primaries.

              Please don’t gloat that the primaries have had a preordained winner for every presidential race since 2012. Particularly not when the most recent preordained winner had to step down, to the acclaim of the vast bulk of the party.

              • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                and BotH Sides aRe ThE SAme, right?

                If you’re going to tell people not to vote, try coming up with an actual alternative action.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I did not say that people should not vote, or that both sides are the same. You lost the argument and you’re strawmanning. The shitty preordained candidate you wanted stepped down. We have a better candidate now.

                  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    You said that the primaries were fixed.

                    If I misunderstood you, it’s because you weren’t clear.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          In a democracy. Politics is absolutely a popularity contest. The population votes. If you want better outcomes, do more for the population. When you don’t give the population what they want, you get totalitarianism which is the course we are on.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          He had a chance. He’s shaking in his shoes now because he knows she will wipe the goddamn floor with his shitty toupee/combover or whatever the hell that thing is. He thought he was going to have it easy against the old man. Now him and his whole party are fucked, scrambling to throw anything against the wall to see if it sticks, because they have nothing. Not even ancillary shit like Hunter’s laptop.

          Come sit down and watch, here’s some popcorn 🍿.

          • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Polls don’t show that at all. Harris isn’t ahead in swing states either. Don’t start taking a victory.

    • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Eh, don’t be so harsh. We posters here are like sports fans following the team in the off season, watching every news drop to analyze and discuss with other fans.

      Outside of here, Most of America just isn’t that clued in to politics for a number of reasons. With the decline in consumption of print & broadcast news (and their inherent slant these days, let’s be honest) you have to put in effort to find the story and follow what’s going on. And that’s for when the Algorithm hasn’t otherwise distracted you with the latest celebrity scandal. For the younger demographic who have to work so damned hard to make a decent living or even just make ends meet, it’s probably just demoralizing to watch two old men yelling at the clouds, and feel like their own concerns aren’t even being discussed. And then you have to go looking watch a couple different takes on the same story (so many stories!) to see past the spin and get even a sense of what the fuck is ACTUALLY happening. People are busy, man.

      I can’t really blame them for just now getting interested, because at least now it is interesting. I hate the situation for what it is, myself, but here we are.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can be a bit of a pot stirrer now and then, but I feel compassion makes me happier. Few people wake with the intent to make bad decisions.