• 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        So you agree that if it isn’t for sustenance, in the case where you can just simply eat something else, it should be illegal?

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sustenance doesn’t mean “the only thing available”.

          Look, I’m excited for lab-grown meat. I’ve reduced my meat consumption significantly over the last year or two. I may not be “in your camp” exactly, but I’m an ally. And it’s probably better to earn and keep allies than to argue semantics in an adversarial way. Win more flies with honey and all that.

          • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I assume you agree o the general statement “Animals shouldn’t be killed for pleasure.”

            If you then have two options for food, one including animal meat and one without, all other things being equal, even nutrition wise, then how is it not “for pleasure” to chose the option with meat?