CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — The Carter Center said it was unable to verify the results of Venezuela’s presidential election, blaming authorities for a “complete lack of transparency” in declaring Nicolas Maduro the winner without providing any individual polling tallies.

The statement Tuesday night by the Atlanta-based group is perhaps the harshest rebuke yet of Venezuela’s chaotic election process because it comes from one of just a handful of outside groups invited by the Maduro government to observe the vote.

“The electoral authority’s failure to announce disaggregated results by polling station constitutes a serious breach of electoral principles,” the Carter Center said. The group, which had a technical mission of 17 experts spread out in four cities across Venezuela, added that the election did not meet international standards and “cannot be considered democratic.”

  • Gsus4
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Because of John Bolton’s botched attempt to take over Venezuela, the US is not going to be taken seriously on this matter…even if they are right this time.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thankfully there are plenty of other voices calling this out including most latin American countries (Including those with left wing governments) and European countries.

      • Gsus4
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes…but it’s based in the US and … “US bad” :/

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s literally not how anything works.

          Human Rights Watch is in the U.S. Are they bad?

          Jewish Voices for Peace, which has been doing great work opposing Israeli genocide, is in the U.S. So I guess genocide is good?

          • Gsus4
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            do I have to explain what I mean by “US bad”, the reductive tankie stance?

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago
    Associated Press Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Associated Press is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.