alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoBMW Adaptive Suspension Can Be Added via Subscription. Suspension As A Service (SAAS)www.bmwblog.comexternal-linkmessage-square255fedilinkarrow-up1922arrow-down18cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldanticorporate@lemmy.giftedmc.comtechnology@lemmy.mlfucksubscriptions@lemmy.world
arrow-up1914arrow-down1external-linkBMW Adaptive Suspension Can Be Added via Subscription. Suspension As A Service (SAAS)www.bmwblog.comalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square255fedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldanticorporate@lemmy.giftedmc.comtechnology@lemmy.mlfucksubscriptions@lemmy.world
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoSeems like forcing liability would be more successful
minus-squaremichaelmrose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoMore successful or more beneficial?
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoForcing the company to be liable for the data they collect would be more likely to stop them from doing it than trying to outlaw them collecting it
minus-squaremichaelmrose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoNo it wouldn’t because poor people can trivially be kept out of court all kinds of ways from binding arbitration to half assed enforcement. As a rule if you want someone to NOT do something you have to tell them they can’t do it!
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoNo it wouldn’t because elected officials don’t represent poor people But we’re talking about buying new BMWs anyway. Your logic was just too stupid to not laugh at
minus-squaremichaelmrose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoThe problem is there is no reason to suspect that a lucrative strategy doesn’t spread to other manufacturers and indeed segments.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoAnd it will be long established before it effects the poor
minus-squaremichaelmrose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoBy which time it will be normalized. How about we fix it now. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future-tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 months agoSo your previous argument was nonsense
Seems like forcing liability would be more successful
More successful or more beneficial?
Forcing the company to be liable for the data they collect would be more likely to stop them from doing it than trying to outlaw them collecting it
No it wouldn’t because poor people can trivially be kept out of court all kinds of ways from binding arbitration to half assed enforcement. As a rule if you want someone to NOT do something you have to tell them they can’t do it!
No it wouldn’t because elected officials don’t represent poor people
But we’re talking about buying new BMWs anyway. Your logic was just too stupid to not laugh at
The problem is there is no reason to suspect that a lucrative strategy doesn’t spread to other manufacturers and indeed segments.
And it will be long established before it effects the poor
By which time it will be normalized. How about we fix it now.
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future-tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/
So your previous argument was nonsense