• zigmus64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wankel types are so fucking cool. Not a lot of engines out there that can come close to their power to weight ratio.

    Maintenance is just a bitch…

    • Plum@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also you get to say Wankel all the time with a serious face.

      • subignition@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’d want to pronounce it closer to as it is in German to be accurate.

        (/ˈvaŋkəl̩/, VUN-kell)

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Anyone who calls it a “rotary” engine is physically incapable of having fun. Plus rotary engines are reciprocating engines that powered early WW1 fighter planes, where the whole engine spins with the propeller for reasons I’m too modern to understand.

        • Mac
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’re called rotaries because they have rotors.

            • Mac
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              They’re called Wankels because one of the contributors was Felix Wankel and his last name happens to have humorous connotations.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Air cooling, spin the heads so they get a whole lot of fresh air at all times and they’re lighter than the alternatives.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also very fuel inefficient, which is the main reason you don’t get them in cars anymore.

      • zigmus64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Huh… can you explain? Did they ever do research on roller apex seals?

        Idk what you’re talking about with laser ignition, but I guess that the name is self explanatory… as in a laser pulse instead of a spark to ignite in the combustion phase….

        But the roller seals are suuuuper fucking interesting. But that would bring its own issues. Sure you’d save the sliding of the apex seal against the chamber walls, but then you’ve got to deal with some sort of roller bearing exposed to the actual combustion process. Plus lubrication is still an issue…

        Fun problem to think about!