• Skydancer@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes exabytes of wireless data in 2023

    Megabytes are absolutely the wrong unit for this amount of data.

    • Mac
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      nobody knows what an exabyte is so why would anybody use that?

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        We live in a world where finding out what an exabyte is takes all of 3 seconds. You really want to argue the standard for communication of information should be based on the most ignorant and unmotivated people?

        • Mac
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          looks like you answered your own question there bud

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t know… I can’t answer what you’re trying to argue. That’s your hill to defend if you want to.

        • Mac
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          at that point what’s the difference?

          • scholar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            They are smaller, more familliar numbers paired with more appropriate units that people have heard of

            • Mac
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I guarantee you that most people still don’t know what a terabyte is. gigabytes, probably…

              anyway all I’m saying is that a headlines goal is to reach and be understood by as many people as possible so obviously they’re not going to use something that nobody knows, like exa, peta, and terabytes.
              I think most people have a general feeling for how much a megabyte is because most of the things that we deal with are sized in megabytes.

              • Strykker@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                But a hell of a lot more people will know what a gigabyte is compared to an exabyte, even I had to think for a few seconds to figure out what scale exabyte was compared to what I know, and I work with computer hardware everyday.

                • Mac
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  yes, that’s what i said

  • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    100EB that’s the one after PB, good to know that the government can store it all as ZFS supports files that large

  • afk_strats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Can I have that in football fields worth of Bill Gates’s paper stacks? Pic for context

    1000003435

    • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      He was hoarding all the toilet paper in the corona supermarket wars. New conspiracy unlocked. /s

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That feels like a bad comparison. Technically paper could told a huge amount of data if you write small enough

    • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      About 14 football fields, stacked up to the crossbar.
      according to GPT-4o-mini that I haven’t double-checked, which means it’s likely wrong somewhere.

      Summary of Paper Volume and Football Fields

      Data Capacity of a Letter-Sized Page

      • Dimensions: 8.5 x 11 inches
      • Average Text Capacity:
        • Approximately 500 to 600 words
        • About 2,500 to 3,000 characters
        • Roughly 2,500 to 3,000 bytes (using standard ASCII/UTF-8)

      Total Pages for 100 Exabytes

      • 100 Exabytes = 10^20 bytes
      • Average Bytes per Page: 2,750 bytes
      • Total Pages: Approximately 36.4 trillion pages

      Volume of the Paper

      • Volume of One Page:
        • Volume = 8.5 inches x 11 inches x 0.004 inches ≈ 0.000374 cubic inches
      • Total Volume for 36.4 Trillion Pages:
        • Total volume ≈ 7.89 million cubic feet

      Volume of a Football Field

      • Dimensions:
        • Length: 120 yards (360 feet)
        • Width: 53.3 yards (160 feet)
        • Height: 10 feet
      • Volume: Approximately 576,000 cubic feet

      Football Fields Needed to Hold the Paper

      • Calculation:
        • Number of football fields ≈ 7,890,000 cubic feet / 576,000 cubic feet ≈ 14
      • Result: Approximately 14 football