Reminder that getting control of the house and senate could make stuff like this potentially get through

This proposal is not only one that expands the number of justices over time but alter things like the court’s shadow docket, require justices to release tax returns, and more

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Requiring the HIGHEST JUSTICES in the Country to NOT take Bribes from Defendants or Plaintiffs depending on the case is DEEP STATE WOKE SOCIALISM!

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      DO allow them to go through a lengthy process, complete with a mountain of precise paperwork, and a committee chosen by their peers, on both sides of the aisle, to accept any form of donation.

      Why?

      Cause they’re gonna find a way anyway. That or literally just give them excellent benefits that basically equal the recent Thomas bullshit.

      Basically I’m searching for other ways to reduce these issues to a minimum long term.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most of the fix should be much simpler. Pay them each $600k, indexed to inflation.

        That should make them pretty resistant to bribery. Your quality of life really doesn’t improve much past that $600k point, even if you’re maintaining two houses. (And the justices aren’t representatives. They don’t need a second house.)

        But yes, their tax returns should be public as well.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes but once you make that much, then amassing more money turns into a game of how you can fuck over the most people to increase your value. See: every billionaire in existance.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            When all your planes come back with bullet holes at points A, B, and C, where should you add additional armor?

              • Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Billionaires are a subset where they’ve already self-selected for extreme greed. Hopefully Supreme Court justices would be closer to a normal population.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Our recent experience with Trump should have made it painfully clear that rich people can be bribed too.

          So no, we don’t need to pay them more. We need to send them to jail if the accept bribes. And the law that enables that should be passed with a note that it is not subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court.