• UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Line won’t go up, so no. capitalist-laugh

    This cannot be right, and your government cannot stand by while it worsens.’

    the-democrat “Oh yeah?” the-republican

    • orshelack [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s even proven to make the line go down. As families have to buy less food to support their kids, grocery stores lower prices to entice shoppers back into spending as much as possible. Wouldn’t be shocked to see the big chains beings major opponents of the free lunch groups.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re right, and that’s another fucked thing about it: sometimes the ruling class does the less profitable thing, especially when it comes to the long-term, sometimes for short term gain and sometimes just out of malice or spite for the poors.

        Expanding food stamp programs puts more money into the economy than it costs per dollar, but that would be feeding the poors so fuck that, for example.

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      One of the major reasons they became free was because the Black Panther Party was doing free meals for kids and the elderly. This obviously made people more interested in their cause, while making the government look incompetent or malicious or both.

      Since the BPP is a shell of its former self, the powers that be have no reason to keep free lunches.