• Hamartia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Well the distinction here is that TV license paying citizens of the UK don’t get the ads.

    • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      But then you could look at Channel 4, which does show ads to UK people, but I think Channel 4 is still okay and I don’t think it has been ruined by ads. So maybe a profit motive is what causes enshittification, rather than just ads. I definitely hate ads but maybe ads alone don’t destroy platforms.

      • Hamartia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You won’t get any disagreement from me on the corrosive effects of advertising.

        I do think that Channel 4 used to regularly produce greater content than it can now. But that probably is more to do with advertising revenue being leeched away to online platforms and the growth of its direct competitors.

        • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Interesting, maybe the content has changed, I probably don’t watch enough TV to have noticed. But I think Channel 4 news is pretty good, and I liked their Paralympics coverage.

          • Hamartia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            They’ve still got a good reputation for news. So good that after a few combative interviews with Tory MPs (back when they were in power a few years ago) the Culture Secretary wanted to sell the channel off.

            Don’t get me wrong they can still produce the occasional good comedy or documentary but they used to do so consistently.