Five@slrpnk.net to Buy it for Life@slrpnk.netEnglish · 5 个月前The Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Productwww.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up1228arrow-down131cross-posted to: technews@radiation.party
arrow-up1197arrow-down1external-linkThe Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Productwww.theatlantic.comFive@slrpnk.net to Buy it for Life@slrpnk.netEnglish · 5 个月前message-square84fedilinkcross-posted to: technews@radiation.party
minus-squarethann@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·5 个月前I have a theory that shitty products fundamentaly out-compete good products today because its way cheaper to market your product as good than to actually develop it well. I call it the craptocracy
minus-squareSoup@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 个月前I want to see craptocracy trend so hard that it makes it into spellcheckers.
I have a theory that shitty products fundamentaly out-compete good products today because its way cheaper to market your product as good than to actually develop it well. I call it the craptocracy
I want to see craptocracy trend so hard that it makes it into spellcheckers.