• rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Hydrogen was never and will never be a viable and efficient transportation fuel

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Special exception maybe for aviation and rocketry. But even then, methane (if made using green energy and the Sebatier process).

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You can get comparable isp with methalox engines without any of the weight required to keep the hydrogen inside the rocket, right?

        • Troy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Hydrogen ISP is still king by a significant margin, but ISP isn’t the whole story – hydrogen comes with additional tank weight (due to lower density) and storage issues (pesky molecular size…). So that trade-off for ISP only really makes sense for an upper stage like Centaur. I’m not sure it makes sense for New Shepherd even…

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Pshh you haven’t seen the peaks of blimp technology. On May 6th when they launch the Hindenburg we’ll see who gets the last laugh.