• Dragonstaff@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Thank you for your reply. I don’t think we disagree that much, but I’m afraid we may be miscommunicating a bit.

    What determines “biological sex”?

    Chromosomes? Except someone with Androgen Insensitivity may have XY chromosomes, but physically appear to be female.

    Genitalia? But we have intersex people with ambiguous genitalia

    Testosterone? Caster Semanya

    Full disclosure: this seems more your field than mine. I don’t think I’m educating you, just trying to clarify my point. It seems like you’re arguing against “There’s no such thing as assigned gender at birth”. What I’m saying that there is no objective way to categorize all humans into neat little sex boxes. Biological sex is a spectrum with most people either at the “male” point or the “female” point, but some examples everywhere in between.

    • Its always this same argument. Did you know that more than 99% of people do in fact fit into neat little boxes. One cannot base their entire argument on the outliers of a dataset thats just bad science.

      Sure u can have a spectrum but thats not really relevent for a majority of people situations or cases. Same as u have the spectrum of how many fingers people have thats a spectrum somewhere bwtween 0 and infinity but calling a gloves manufacturer Philangaphobic for not accommodating people is ridiculous.

      At some point we need to decide where we draw the boxes and most likly some people won’t qualify for either box so perhaps they can have their own. Ive been called transphobic for saying the trans should simply be lumped in with the disabled (for change room and bathroom purposes) i dont see how this is the case it just seems like a practical solution given the relative population distribution and well established infrastructure.