Pff somebody’s billionaire forgot to shut down the opinion column.
https://www.economistgroup.com/esg/board
Chaired by a Baron, the Lord Paul Deighton, who also chairs the Heathrow airport and was involved in banking and the conservative governments of UK, handling part of the covid crisis for Boris, and being involved with the Pandora papers scandal.
The rest of the board has their own stories.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Deighton,_Baron_Deighton
I’m guessing people in US allies countries like the UK, even billionaires, realize how bad Trump will be for foreign relations. So while Musk and Besos will suck his dick because all of their shit is in the US, these guys aren’t so eager to play ball.
So not somebody’s billionaire but somebody’s group of billionaires.
Not the greatest background but certainly unsurprising for The Economist. Oh well, an endorsement is an endorsement.
Removed by mod
Probably because they’ve always supported right wing ideology.
Removed by mod
You can just block .ml at an instance level and you’ll be better off for it and you can add Hexbear in there too.
I didn’t see what you were responding to, but I’m very close to doing this. Yesterday I unsubbed from just about all the .ml communities I was subbed to. They’re impossible to talk to and have gotten incredibly nasty. They just start indignantly name-calling immediately, there’s no real engagement anymore. I consider myself to be extremely left wing, but I also live in the real world. They are insufferable.
If by extremely left wing you mean democrat, you are right wing
Removed by mod
The Economist - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Economist:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
The Economist - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Economist:
Wiki: reliable - Most editors consider The Economist generally reliable. Distinctively, its news articles appear without bylines and are written in editorial voice. Within these articles, Wikipedia editors should use their judgement to discern factual content – which can be generally relied upon – from analytical content, which should be used in accordance with the guideline on opinion in reliable sources. Its pseudonymous commentary columns and other opinion pieces should also be handled according to this guideline.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Least biased, right 😂
