• zagaberoo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    That makes sense, but what is the material difference? Isn’t it ultimately the same thing by a different name?

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Material difference of specific pronouns? Someone feels better, and I’m out no extra effort, I guess…

      It’s as much difference as personal preference in chocolate bar brands.

      • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        I totally get respecting specific pronouns, no confusion there.

        I don’t see how the scenario presented in OP is different from wanting to be referred to in the third person.

        • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Ah! Effectively none.

          Which does bring up an unusual case: how should drag be referred to as part of a group? They and drag? Or would just they suffice?

          • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            They. It’s the same as if you refer to a group of people with a man in it. The “he” is discarded. Drag doesn’t use plural independent pronouns.

          • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Some degree of identity erasure is inherent with mass pronouns; interesting question!