alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 11 days agoIntel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recoverwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1151arrow-down11cross-posted to: hardware@programming.dev
arrow-up1150arrow-down1external-linkIntel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recoverwww.tomshardware.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 11 days agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: hardware@programming.dev
minus-squareLeroyJenkins@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down4·11 days agoas much as I think Intel is dumb, it’s definitely not in the consumers best interest for Intel to go out of business or absorbed into another company
minus-squareMettled@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·11 days agoI will take Intel being sold or going under over cronyism and corporate welfare.
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 days agoWhy is it in anyone’s best interest to keep it as a monopoly if it can’t pay its bills? Its products are going to stagnate either way, injecting money is useless.
as much as I think Intel is dumb, it’s definitely not in the consumers best interest for Intel to go out of business or absorbed into another company
I will take Intel being sold or going under over cronyism and corporate welfare.
Why is it in anyone’s best interest to keep it as a monopoly if it can’t pay its bills? Its products are going to stagnate either way, injecting money is useless.