• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Both things can be bad, you don’t have to defend pornography of young child characters.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I wasn’t defending it I was just pointing out that they’re not the source

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They literally are making AI Porn of a child. That’s the context of this discussion. You can’t just say “nuh uh no they didn’t.”

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          But they fucking didn’t, it’s an anime character you weirdo, stop trying to insinuate something that isn’t there.

          Every time you try and insinuate that a series of lines are the same thing as an actual photograph you diminish the crime that you are railing against. How can you not see that?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            Child Pornography is illegal in most countries, including Japan, including in the form of drawings, sketches, and other artistic representations. AI Generated Child Pornography is illegal.