• vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Trump’s point about NATO countries needing to adhere to the funding that was agreed with mutually is a good one and I’m super confused why he was ridiculed about it when he said it. I mean, what’s the point of the alliance if we don’t do the things we agree to do?

    • jmsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      I despise him, but 1 of 2 good things I think he did was call out NATO nations for not contributing their fair share. Merkel’s face when he said this was like that of a dog that’s been caught getting into the cupboard.

      (the other thing he did was to call out drug companies for making medications so expensive. of course he didn’t followup, but that was a good thing to say)

    • rhys the great@mastodon.rhys.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      @vga @gravitas_deficiency Adhering to the much-flaunted spending commitments wasn’t ridiculous, but Trump’s framing of it was.

      Back when he raised it, he was threatening to withdraw the US from the alliance if other nations didn’t start adhering to it, and as recently as this year he’s said he’ll encourage Putin to do “whatever the hell he wants” to states who don’t meet the spending commitment, directly undermining the collective defence principle of NATO.

    • remembergladio@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      European here. That money is more like a protection racket than anything. When the US means protection they mean vassality. The NATO empowered fascists and killed left-wing politician. Fuck the NATO.