• archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    They can’t force anyone to vote for them.

    Yup, which is why you need to give them reason to vote.

    Democrats have been parading around “most important election of our lifetime” for fucking years - don’t be surprised that it didn’t work yet again.

    The reason why Trump is popular is because there is legitimate pain and struggle in the working class, and he affirmed that pain and struggle (even if he was misidentifying the source of that pain). Telling voters “things are good, actually, and the other guy is gonna ruin it” is just dumb.

    Democrats didn’t run on popular policy and they got destroyed because of it.

    • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Who said “things are good actually”?? Seems to me that Harris had plenty of policy proposals that would have resulted in a meaningful improvement to the bottom line of the average American.

      Biden has also been better for the average American than trump was. For fucks sake, Trump actually got away with raising taxes on all of us to support his tax cut for the rich, simply because the average person is too low information to grasp the idea of a tax cut that expires!

      So yeah, plenty of actual reasons to say that one candidate is better than the other, without needing to be wowed by an actual messiah who can dismantle our fucked up system and solve everybody’s problems.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        They repeatedly touted our economic recovery was ‘the best in the G6’.

        Even when our economy is ‘good’ it’s shit for most people. That’s the problem with being a neoliberal status quo party: it doesn’t help most of the people they need to vote for them

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They had a reason to vote.

      Their reason was that a rapist fascist who quoted Hitler and clearly has dementia that promised to deport millions of people and be a dictator on day one only had a 50/50 chance of being president.

      And they didn’t care because they didn’t like Kamala Harris much. Was she any of those things? No. But her boss is funding the same genocide in Israel that Trump said to Netanyahu “finish the job” about on national television, so no one better vote for her either!

      Sorry, not a good enough reason to not stop Trump. Not a good enough reason to refuse to vote. Not a good enough reason to vote third party.

      For fuck’s sake, do you think people voted for Joe Biden in 2020 because they thought he would be a terrific president?

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        do you think people voted for Joe Biden in 2020 because they thought he would be a terrific president?

        they voted for Biden because he made meaningful concessions to the progressive caucus. He gave Bernie a prominent roll in his campaign and made promises about student loan forgiveness and raising the minimum wage, on top of affirming people’s anxiety about covid and a pledge to address it.

        Harris had none of that. She didn’t primary against progressive candidates, didn’t have to address progressive concerns, and when there was vocal opposition to any of her policies she said “excuse me, i’m speaking”. She was more right-moderate than Biden was, even if only because she didn’t face the progressive primary he did.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You still don’t get it.

          It isn’t about voting for Harris.

          It’s about voting against Trump.

          You can give me all sorts of reasons why Harris wasn’t an appealing candidate. It’s not relevant. Trump was a clear and present danger.

          I don’t give a shit about whether or not people liked her or whatever their idealistic reasons not to vote for her were. None of them justify allowing Trump to take office by refusing stop him from doing it. That is on people who refused to vote or vote third party. You were not going to get the candidate you wanted this year. You were a fool if you didn’t know that.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I voted for Harris. But in the first-past-the-post system, all that matters for a party is victory. That is how you judge the success of party officials. There is a whole class of extremely well-paid Democratic party officials whose ENTIRE JOB is to figure out how to select a candidate and sell them to the American people. That is literally their entire job.

            The average voters is low-information, doesn’t pay attention, and assumes both sides frequently lie. (And they’re not wrong about the lying.) You can truthfully call the other side fascist, but the other side will simply say you’re the fascist, and low-information voters can’t tell the difference.

            Voters have always been low-information. This isn’t anything new. The entire reason we have primaries is that it forces candidates to actually try their hand at mass appeal and to take the temperature of the electorate. Democratic leaders kept Biden in far too long, til it was too late to hold a proper primary.

            You can blame it on those who don’t vote, but the truth is that most people pay attention to politics only tangentially. If you, as a political operator, didn’t find a way to reach these voters, you have failed.

            Does the blame ultimately fall on those who didn’t vote for Biden? Sure. But the same is true of those who didn’t vote for Walter Mondale. It doesn’t mean Harris isn’t just as big a failure as Mondale.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              The average voters is low-information, doesn’t pay attention, and assumes both sides frequently lie.

              Voters have always been low-information. This isn’t anything new.

              Then it isn’t the fault of the Harris campaign.

              The entire reason we have primaries is that it forces candidates to actually try their hand at mass appeal and to take the temperature of the electorate.

              That would not make a difference if voters have always been low-information.

              You can blame it on those who don’t vote, but the truth is that most people pay attention to politics only tangentially. If you, as a political operator, didn’t find a way to reach these voters, you have failed.

              You mean like have multiple TV channels and foreign governments pump out endless propaganda? You’re right, the real issue in America is that there’s no Democrat version of Fox News, Newsmax, etc. and they haven’t reached out to Putin for help.

              Also, this is nothing like Reagan/Mondale. Reagan never said he would be a dictator. Reagan never quoted Hitler.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You’re talking to me as if I’m one of those non-voters.

            Most Americans are not the terminally-online type - they didn’t see your impassioned warnings about Trump. All they heard was that there was an election, and the choice was between Trump and Harris, and neither one really had anything material to offer them. To them, democrats screaming about how bad Trump is is just par for the course. They needed more than to not be Trump, and they didn’t deliver.

            Go ahead and scream into the void if you want. None of it will change the fact that Harris lost because she ran a bad campaign and turned her back on meaningful progress.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Well you’re defending them.

              And it’s has nothing to do with my warnings. It has to do with the literal words he said out loud repeatedly.

              Now all you’re saying is American voters are ignorant and that’s somehow Kamala Harris’ fault. If they didn’t know what Trump had to say, they didn’t know what Harris had to say.

              Again not a good excuse.

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 minutes ago

                I’m not defending them, I’m just explaining why that message didn’t land the way you think it should have.

                Most people think democrats are alarmist (and they often are), and even if they thought the threat was credible, they don’t think it would affect them.

                Call them dumb if you want, I don’t care, democrats didn’t do enough to turn them out either way.