I was thinking about this while we’ve been doing the Khan memes.

La’an is a descendent of Khan, meaning she has genetically augmented DNA.

If Una had a kid and didn’t augment that kid’s DNA further, could that kid legally be in Starfleet?

Is there a “as long as your own personal DNA wasn’t augmented, you can be in Starfleet?” Because that doesn’t make much sense to me.

  • NegativeNull@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Una had augments added after birth. La’na only is decedent of Khan. She herself has no added augments (beyond what she was born with genetically). That’s my guess?

    Edit: I guess that’s kind of what you said in the post description I didn’t read close enough

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right, but if Una had a kid, would it be legal for the kid to be in Starfleet? What if the kid was with another augment?

          • hallettj@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not necessarily - real gene therapies that are in use now are carefully designed so that modifications are not inherited. For example, Casgevy which targets blood stem cells to treat sickle cell anemia. Because the treatment is limited to specific types of cells modifications don’t get into the germ line.

          • boraca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Depends if they altered her eggs too. It’s a different story with dudes, who produce gametes for all their lives, as opposed to women, who are born with all the gametes they will have.