• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    A) 3 random, disconnected positions are not a lurch to the left, they’re just…3 random policies.

    B) She abandoned her Medicare for All position before the end of her 2020 run for something less progressive.

    C) None of these happened after 2020, how is any of it evidence that they went too far left in 2024?

    Anyway, I’m gonna stop replying now. It’s a waste of my time, and I’m starting to feel like I’m punching down.

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      A) they are policies to the left of center. Saying they are random policies doesn’t even make sense.

      B) something less progressive but still left of center. Meaning a move to the left.

      C) the way time works, things have to happen before 2024 for them to exist in 2024. No one is saying “too far left”. That’s a straw man you are try to create.

      Your opinion of how left Kamala was doesn’t matter.

      It’s the voters opinions that matters. Republican propaganda convinced voters that Kamala is a radical leftists.

      I agree that you should stop replying based on your feelings. Join reality instead.