Yeah, both sides amiright?

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They think they get to wipe their hands of it because they “didn’t participate”, refusing to concede that said choice still counts as their participation. Through ignorance, cruelty, and/or privilege, they’ll blame everyone else for the state of the world while refusing to do their part.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Howard Zinn - you can’t be neutral on a moving train. The Enlightened Centrists ™ always look like suuuuuch dipshits when they talk about “both sides”.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Howard Zinn would not support the genocide of Palestinians nor voting for genociders, nor is withholding a vote neutrality. Zinn was forcefully against the War on Vietnam before it was acceptable in liberal academic circkes and drew a hard line on it.

        Have you read his books?

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          I have indeed read his books. I doubt he would have welcomed the idea of putting donvict in office because something something “Genocide Joe”.