hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 days agoImperial rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up1657arrow-down142
arrow-up1615arrow-down1external-linkImperial rulelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 days agomessage-square172fedilink
minus-squareDragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoSo imperialism is okay when you have a de jure cassus belli?
minus-squareAntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 hours agoI’m strongly of the belief, by reading them in the context provided, that you don’t know what any of those words mean
minus-squareDragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoImperialism - building an empire by exerting control over foreign powers de jure - by law cassus belli - cause for war So conquering other places is okay when the law says you have a good reason to send soldiers marching down their streets?
So imperialism is okay when you have a de jure cassus belli?
I’m strongly of the belief, by reading them in the context provided, that you don’t know what any of those words mean
Imperialism - building an empire by exerting control over foreign powers
de jure - by law
cassus belli - cause for war
So conquering other places is okay when the law says you have a good reason to send soldiers marching down their streets?