BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 22 hours agoLG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up127arrow-down1external-linkLG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000www.theverge.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square18fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down6·22 hours agoWhat’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
minus-squareRai@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down4·21 hours agoIt’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-219 hours agoI thought the joke was obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
minus-squareK̺͆e̺͆t̺͆a̺͆m̺͆i̺͆n̺͆e̺͆@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoDont display downvotes, save that cortisol
minus-squaref2sfljLhdtTZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·21 hours agoThat’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
minus-squarecrawancon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·21 hours agopresenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.
What’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
It’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
I thought the joke was obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
Dont display downvotes, save that cortisol
It was obvious to me!
That’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
Number go up
presenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.