On Hexbear, moderators may factor upvote activity into moderation decisions.

Some users treat upvotes as a “mark as read” function, which weakens score reliability and therefore negatively impacts The Algorithm.

Please provide a separate mechanism for users to identify posts that they have already read, which will persist on later visits.

  • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The API has an endpoint for marking posts as read. It would be a matter of adding a button to the interface to mark the post as read.

    I’m sure if an issue was opened on the Lemmy UI side it could be implemented by someone.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yes, but you don’t see new comments, plus this would be for posts and comments. If you just hide a comment, you don’t see new replies. Marking as read is useful.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        As it is, you only see new comments if you scroll past the post again (and your client has refreshed it) or if you open it directly. If your client hasn’t updated the comment count or if you refresh your feed and the post falls off, you’ll never see it anyway.

        A “Watch” feature would solve this better. If you watch a post, you get aggregated notifications for edits and comments on the post. If you watch a comment, you get aggregated notifications for replies to it or any of its children.

        By aggregated notifications, I mean that you’d get one notification that said “The post you watched has been edited; 5 new comments” rather than a notification for each new comment.

        Then, in addition to exposing a “Watch” action on posts and comments, clients could also enable users to automatically hide posts that are watched, either by marking them as hidden or by hiding watched posts without updates.

        If the latter approach were taken, notifications might not even be necessary - the post could just get added back into the user’s feed when changes were made. It would result in a similar experience to forums, where new activity in a topic would bump it to the front, but it would only impact the people who were watching it.

        You can kinda get that behavior by sorting your feed by Active, but this could be used with other sorting methods.

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Well, I’ve turned on that feature as a test (after the question was posted) and I saw your reply just fine. That’s no difference from how it’s been before I turned on the feature.

        What has never worked for me (I’m not sure if it’s a bug or by design) is a notification for a reply to your reply. I only ever see notifications of direct replies, not indirect ones.

        In other words, if someone replies directly to me, I know about it, but if someone replies to that reply, I don’t.

        • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I only ever see notifications of direct replies, not indirect ones.

          Definitely by design. I do not want to receive a geometrically increasing number of notifications as a comment chain expanded underneath my comment.

          On reddit (maybe it was the Enhancement Suite) IIRC is an option to Watch a thread, which basically did what you want