• TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yes, exactly why I said it’s a platitude. It’s thoughtless and trite. I’m saying: consumption is not ethical, no matter which system. There is no ethical consumption.

    That’s a false dichotomy…even if we agreed with your definition of all consumption being unethical, it wouldn’t mean that there aren’t different levels of unethical practices used to produce those consumables.

    All consumption being unethical does not mean that all forms of production are equally unethical. If that’s the case you wouldn’t really have a problem with sending the kids back to the mines.

    It paints consumers as mere puppets or robots who are unable to make choices or decisions that could lead to a reduction of suffering.

    Can you point to a time in history where a general boycott of a dangerous or harmful product was successful without the help of government intervention?

    Any other system created by humans is flawed and infected the human disease, doomed to create suffering and torment.

    And apparently that doesn’t happen under capitalism? Then what exactly are you bitching about plastic for?

    “ethical consumption” in any other living system is wishful thinking. It doesn’t exist.

    Again, your argument is based on a forced false dichotomy.

    Not to mention that it seems like you are really just a libertarian angry at consumers for participating in the “free market”.

    You can’t simultaneously believe that the free market is the best way to regulate the economy, but upset at the people for their consumption habits in a free market.