People who make low effort AI bashing commentary videos, but it’s just them reading a script over some stock footage. You shouldn’t be making worse content than an AI my guy.

  • Mac
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    worse content than AI

    False.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Many of them really consider their spoken part to be the majority of their content, the stock footage is there to keep our attention, it isn’t necessarily the whole point of their channel and lets them get their points across without spending tons of time or money on their own footage. Many of this style of youtuber will also include charts, graphs, or diagrams when relevant between the stock footage. It gets them more views than some boring powerpoint style presentation between graphics.

      • Mac
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yes, I agree. I’m often interested in what they have to say and the charts and graphs are a major bonus.
        Stock images as visual filler don’t bother me.

        This is 1000x better than an AI video.