• Miaou@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Buying a big SUV, shopping at h&m, eating red meat multiple times a week, and flying to the other side of the world during summer, are all worse than voting for climate change. Companies don’t pollute for the sake of it.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Check out the EPA’s stats on ghg emissions at this LINK. 28% of emissions total are from non-agriculture/shipping transportation, and if you break that down then 57% of the 28% are light duty vehicles, all larger road vehicles are 23%, and aircraft are 9%.

      Since 2005 emissions carbon-equivalent total of the USA has fallen about a billion metric tons thanks to awareness and federal programs to reduce and eliminate emissions, almost exclusively in the Electrical Power sector.

      So even if you cut out all consumer non-business transport you’re left with 72% of emissions. A person who votes to curttail polution does more good than a person who drives a hybrid.

      • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Hybrids don’t reduce CO2 emissions that much anyway. Better to go all electric and vote for climate protection.