return2ozma@lemmy.world to unions@lemmy.ml · 3 days agoKamala Harris told Teamsters president she'd win "with you or without you"www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up199arrow-down113cross-posted to: electoralism@hexbear.netnews@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
arrow-up186arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris told Teamsters president she'd win "with you or without you"www.newsweek.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to unions@lemmy.ml · 3 days agomessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: electoralism@hexbear.netnews@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
minus-squareJoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down11·3 days agothat’s cool, they’re already union and do not give a fuck about the wagies that will now have to union under Republican rule. they got theirs.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·3 days agoThis article is about how, instead of making concessions to garner union endorsement, Harris told labor she did didn’t need them and didn’t give a fuck about them. And then she lost. Maybe she would have lost anyway; we’ll never know. But labor can’t just give the Democratic Party limitless support, because Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.
that’s cool, they’re already union and do not give a fuck about the wagies that will now have to union under Republican rule. they got theirs.
This article is about how, instead of making concessions to garner union endorsement, Harris told labor she did didn’t need them and didn’t give a fuck about them. And then she lost.
Maybe she would have lost anyway; we’ll never know. But labor can’t just give the Democratic Party limitless support, because Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.