wegbier@feddit.org to Technik@feddit.org · 2 days agoAI-Generated Images Discourage Me From Reading Your Blognelson.cloudexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up171arrow-down16cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up165arrow-down1external-linkAI-Generated Images Discourage Me From Reading Your Blognelson.cloudwegbier@feddit.org to Technik@feddit.org · 2 days agomessage-square9fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squarebane_killgrind@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·2 days agoI would, I also dislike generated images. There’s plenty of useful posts this guy has. I don’t think this topic needs any more than he said.
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 days agoDon’t judge a book by its cover, unless it’s AI generated.
minus-squareTheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down4·2 days agoNgl, if the cover of a book read “made in part by plagiarism machines”, I’m grabbing a different book.
minus-squarebane_killgrind@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·2 days agoAbsolutely. The images should be in some way convey reliable information about the article. Reliability goes out the window with generated slop.
I would, I also dislike generated images.
There’s plenty of useful posts this guy has. I don’t think this topic needs any more than he said.
Don’t judge a book by its cover, unless it’s AI generated.
Ngl, if the cover of a book read “made in part by plagiarism machines”, I’m grabbing a different book.
Absolutely. The images should be in some way convey reliable information about the article. Reliability goes out the window with generated slop.