can’t see how the way you wrote that comment all but explicitly states that the LSD usage was a bad thing?
Don’t bring your preconceptions to my comment, or at the very least, don’t accuse me of subtext with your own delusions as a source.
My comment was mocking Steve Jobs’ productivity, as in, what was he actually working in. LSD parties and interfering with HR is not working directly with the engineering and quality of the products. That’s the extent of the comment. Your perceptions on LSD are irrelevant to me.
You seriously can’t see how the way you wrote that comment all but explicitly states that the LSD usage was a bad thing?
If that wasn’t your intention you need to critically re-examine how you write.
Don’t bring your preconceptions to my comment, or at the very least, don’t accuse me of subtext with your own delusions as a source.
My comment was mocking Steve Jobs’ productivity, as in, what was he actually working in. LSD parties and interfering with HR is not working directly with the engineering and quality of the products. That’s the extent of the comment. Your perceptions on LSD are irrelevant to me.
Clearly I’m not the only person who read it that way. No need to single me out.
Single you out? You’re the one replying as if you’re correct in your interpretation.
But sure, if that hurt you: you and the single other person who misread the comment are both equally wrong. Better?
You’re replying as if you’re correct too…? It’s called a disagreement? Christ you’re a hostile one aren’t you