• pory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    “it’s so good it could be an official Sonic game” is… not very indicative of quality.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I haven’t ever heard anyone say Sonic 1-3 are bad so this is in the clear.

      • pory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        “Official Sonic games” run the gamut from Sonic 2 to Sonic Boom/'06. It’s kind of the poster child for a franchise that is an unstoppable media juggernaut that has beloved all-time classic games… and some absolute garbage games.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Yeah but if you watch the trailer its clearly homage to the 2D games. So we can kind of judge quality on that, which flash game developers mastered long ago.

          Edit: also Sonic 1, 2, 3 & Knuckles are masterpieces so Idk about this gamut talk including those.

          • pory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            Even limited to 2D Sonics, there are official Sega products that are just terrible. Remember Sonic 4?

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              It’s still a tolerable playthrough, especially with part 2 in the mix.

              And honestly, people get stuck talking about 1-3 as if they had stopped making 2D Sonic games until 4, but the Nintendo portable games are mostly some shade of solid, with maybe a couple of exceptions.

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Thats a 2010 game and itself a simulacrum of the classic Sonic era. That was also 2.5D and not 2D, which already breaks from what we see in this post.

      • cevn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I will say it, Sonic 1 is bad. Going fast is actually never the answer in that game somehow. Maybe I just suck. 2 and 3 are obviously great.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        There was a period in there where people got into the idea that “it was never good” and made the case for 1-3 as a bit of a contrarian take.

        Got way less defensible in the context of Generations, Mania and Frontiers getting a bit of a franchise revival going, but it was a thing for a while.