• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If the judges support that opinion, then that’s not a reimagining, that’s the proper interpretation.

    You can talk all day about intent, but a law IS how it’s applied, not how it was meant to be applied.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The reimagining is so bad that conservative justices have started demanding that the law schools start teaching their garbage theories.

      The problem is of course they have no actual legal theory because their whole movement was invented by the Federalist Society.

      https://fedsoc.org/

      They are essentially activist conservative judges trying to rewrite our laws in their bizarre reimagining of history.