• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let’s for a second assume it is a mental illness, how does that make the people feel who are experiencing it? Do they feel loved and understood?

    “Hate the sin, love the sinner” has been the historical approach far-right evangelicals use to gull parents into conversation therapy for their kids.

    Conservatives have adopted much of the same liberalish compassionate language up top and horrifyingly brutal physical, emotional, and sexual abuse on the back end for drug rehabilitation and prison reform.

    The American idea of love and understanding is to brainwash them into compliance with social norms, while insisting the torture they’re inflicting is a kindness.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It should be noted that the framing of it as a sin was after the medical community accepted its not a mental illness. Before that it was “you’re sick and need help”.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      “Hate the sin, love the sinner”

      The problem is that people don’t actually do the second, they replace “love” with “pity.” Pity isn’t love, it’s intolerance. If you truly love someone, you won’t care whether they sin or not, you’ll just love them for who they are and want them to be the happiest they can be.

      Whether homosexuality is a sin shouldn’t be relevant at all, sin is between an individual and their god, especially in Christianity.

      The problem is that people justify their intolerance by misinterpreting or misapplying phrases like these. They think things like conversion therapy is a demonstration of love, when in fact it’s a demonstration of brutal intolerance.

      The root of the problem here is intolerance, not the words we use to describe something.