Would you say something about ‘tone policing’? Rejecting tone policing can be quite handy to prevent ‘civil’ liberals from ignoring substance and shutting down a discussion. But as it’s ultimately a rejection of a type of ad hominem and you’re being quite persuasive about the flaws in such fallacies, I’m wondering what your view is.
Would you say something about ‘tone policing’? Rejecting tone policing can be quite handy to prevent ‘civil’ liberals from ignoring substance and shutting down a discussion. But as it’s ultimately a rejection of a type of ad hominem and you’re being quite persuasive about the flaws in such fallacies, I’m wondering what your view is.