• CharmOffensive@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Because they never exercise it in respect to social media?

    See how you can’t see past this one simple concept and keep circling back?

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You don’t think it’s important for them to have the ability, the assurance of that? I’m not circling back but rather just trying to help you to understand their pov.

      What, you think the government thinks “oh we don’t care about having more control over social media, we’re not going to use that anyway, might as well let China have that control”? I mean come on lol.

      • CharmOffensive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You still think this is about exerting a control they have yet to exercise, instead of the far more obvious thing I’ve repeated about 5 times and you’ve ignored each time:

        THIS IS PROTECTIONISM FOR AMERICAN SOCIAL MEDIA MAGNATES.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I mean I’ve always held the view that it’s both. It was just the control thing that seemed to be a hangup for you.

          • CharmOffensive@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s both, just that it’s really about one of them and the other is just a cherry on top.

            Don’t try to frame this as a hangup of mine and act like you haven’t been thoroughly participating in this debate in a way entirely hyperfixated on “it’s about control”. You’re better than that.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Don’t try to frame this as a hangup of mine and act like you haven’t been thoroughly participating in this debate in a way entirely hyperfixated on “it’s about control”

              I’m not sure how you’ve been reading this whole thing but it’s sorta the part you disagreed with so that’s what the discussion became about