• PupBiru@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    and if that is indeed the point: that the difference is simply size, then what does that law look like? surely it would need to specify a size of the relevant neural network that is able to derive works

    but that’s then just an arbitrary number because we just don’t know what it would be

    • SIGSEGV@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I don’t even think that matters much, right? Current LLMs already out-compete humans at many tasks. I think we’re already past the threshold, at least in some regards. That is to say, I don’t think there is a hard line because it depends on what your testing criteria are.