• HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Are you trying to say that the rape of a minor could have been a good thing?

    • john89@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If not, would it be fair to say this is a victimless crime?

      Did you miss this part?

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        No, but it is a crime with a victim. And it is well defined as well.

        Congratulations, you’ve defended pedophilia and pedophiles.

        • john89@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Lol, I can tell you’re getting upset about this so I’m just gonna block you.

          No room for dysfunctional discussions like these where you’re only saying what sounds nice in your head, regardless of what the other person is saying.

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            Dude, the teacher is a pedophile and you are asking if her actions were good. That’s defending pedophilia.

            Edit: if you are having issues with how that would work, switch the genders of the adult and child and then see how you feel.

          • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I’m just gonna block you No room for dysfunctional discussions

            Hmm, pretty sure this is not the way to have a functional discussion.

            • john89@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              Right. There’s no discussion to be had because he’s not arguing in good faith.

              The only solution is to block him and move on. Hopefully you’ll understand this when you’re older.

              In all honesty though, you’re just getting mad at me because I blocked someone that agreed with you. It’s sad you’re not genuine enough to admit it so I have to admit it for you.

              Probably going to block you too, but let’s see how you respond to this.