a place for it

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 days ago

      extremely normal thing and definitely not cult shit (ziz):

      Something I don’t think I ended up writing, was a random conversation on what it meant to be good and a Sith. In which I said, something like, well, I’m doing whatever I want, no matter what, which in my case is good things.

      also seems weird that vassar went from failed let-me-google-scholar-that-for-you fake medical startup to a niche rat cult leader. can’t any single one of these people get a normal job?

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’m so used to bad rat science being expressed in obscurantist math and quantum physics jargon that the kindergarten neuro woo like “each half-a-brain has a 1 in 20 chance of being ontologically Good” and “nonbinary people have one half of their brain be transgender” throws me off.

      Where are the Planck units and the h-bars, category theory, maybe something about Turing machines or Gödel? Can’t you at least throw in a square root or something? Is this all it takes to stroke the a modern STEM dweeb’s ego? I guess all the talk about “debugging” and “jailbreaking” compensates for the infantile aesthetics of the crankery.

    • o7___o7@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Footnote 1: As a consequence of this approach to thinking and life, rationalists are, as a rule, unbelievably prolix, wall-eyed, and tedious writers, and also polyamorous.

      “Wall-eyed” hit me as odd, so I go to look it up: https://www.wordnik.com/words/walleyed

      The first entry:

      adjective Often Offensive Affected with exotropia.

      Well-played, Max!

      • jonhendry@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Merriam-Webster says “marked by a wild irrational staring of the eyes”

        Which sounds a bit more accurate than a mere physical quirk.

    • FRANK.MCCONNEL@fosstodon.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      @dgerard I can’t help but imagine what a Zizian would do if one endarkened them with the knowledge that lettuce in salad was not allowed to grow to maturity (flowering) before being harvested and consumed