• Lvxferre [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I mentioned this in another thread, but might as well develop it here: there’s no “new world order”, it’s “new USA order”. In other words I don’t think that this network state will be able to spread outside USA; it seems to rely too much on USA’s specificities (strong tech centres, and a rather lax gov that allows itself to be toppled).

    And, even if the autocoup succeeds and the network state replaces the United-Statian government, the former will only get a fraction of the power of the later. External actors will intervene and grab their chunks of the pizza; and some power will be simply gone (e.g. international soft power - see Trump taunting Commonwealth, EU, some LatAm countries.)

    I might be wrong, however. Don’t trust too much what I say.

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    For people who see the X icon and want to nope out of reading, note that it may be worth persisting. Here’s the first part of the article:

    Elon Musk’s attempt to destroy the United States government isn’t random chaos. It’s the methodical execution of the “network state” blueprint.

    Yet even as tech billionaires openly implement their well-documented playbook for dismantling American democracy, no one will dare say the words “network state” – except for Steve Bannon, unfortunately.