Even inside the Harris campaign, there was dissent about whether she needed to take a more aggressive stance for Gaza.

A Harris organizer who worked on youth turnout said that senior campaign officials gave them an order: When they sent out mass volunteer or fundraising emails and people replied by asking about Gaza, they were told to mark it as “no response.” The result? They seldom ended up engaging with voters on that issue.

“We also didn’t create a new category for Gaza responses out of fear that category would be leaked. Instead we were told to mark them as ‘no response,’” the organizer said, faulting top Harris campaign leaders for failing to address the issue. “The only ‘clowns’ out there are those who were in senior leadership and decided to abdicate on this issue, who silenced a Palestinian speaker at the DNC, and who told us to ignore it every time a voter asked us about Gaza.”

  • blakenong@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    People really need to vote. There is never going to be a candidate that meets 100% of what you want. If you don’t vote, you don’t care.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There is never going to be a candidate that meets 100% of what you want

      Genocide support is a big deal to some people.

      • blakenong@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It sure is, and since all of the people running had no plans to stop it, they chose to elect Trump… who has plans to speed it up for land development. Real brainiacs.