• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    It’s not the AI you’re thinking of. This has nothing to do with image creation or large language models.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 天前

      Good (but sad) demo of how LLMs and stable diffusion have completely poisoned the term AI to the point that even legit use-cases get shit on by association.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        Or how it has normalized using AI for everything between heaven and earth, when what is actually going on is machine learning. AI implies that the machine is thinking for itself, which of course leads (reasonable) people to draw conclusions that it’s not a very reliable source.

      • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 天前

        Nothing in existence that has been labeled AI is AI. If AI (actual meaning of the words) exists, it’s in some secret facility and we don’t know about it. AI outside of fiction is a meaningless marketing term. That was already the case before LLMs and stable diffusion.

          • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 小时前

            Let’s go ahead and call Trump’s politics “liberal justice”. It’s all just meaningless words that we can associate with whatever we want. That’s more along the lines of how “AI” is used in marketing.

          • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 天前

            No. That’s another bullshit marketing term people came up with when confronted with the fact that their “AI” contains no I.

            • MurrayL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 小时前

              No, it’s a term that creates a meaningful distinction between what you seem to think AI means and what it actually means.

              If you refuse to accept either term then I can only assume you’re just being stubborn for the sake of it.

              • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 小时前

                A distinction necessitated by marketing abusing it and watering it down beyond usefulness. Rinse and repeat and we’ll be talking about SAAGAITSRI (super advanced actual general artificial intelligence that shows real intelligence) in 10 to 20 years.